Exergoeconomic Optimization of a Novel Hydrogen Generation System Based on Geothermal Energy

Document Type : Research Article


1 Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran

2 Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, university of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 School of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran


Hydrogen can be a good energy carrier for renewable energies in the long-term due to its appropriate characteristics. However, hydrogen alone is not found in nature and cannot be produced directly. For this purpose, some energy needs to be spent on hydrogen separation. One of the most important hydrogen production methods is the use of electric power to separate hydrogen in an electrolyzer system. In this paper, an exergoeconomic and thermodynamic procedure is applied to the analysis of a novel power generation system based on geothermal energy for hydrogen production. A recuperator is used in the novel system to increase the performance of the system. Five decision variables are considered to optimize system performance. The objective is to maximize the exergy efficiency and on the other hand, minimize the total cost rate of the system. The results of the simulation show that incorporating the recuperator increases the total power production by 20.65%, the energy efficiency by 20.71%, the exergy efficiency by 20.66%, and hydrogen production by 11.91%. Moreover, implementing the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm increases power generation by 4.3%, energy efficiency by 4.2%, exergy efficiency by 4.3%, hydrogen production by 1%, and decreases cost rate by 1%.


Ahmadi, P., Dincer, I., and Rosen, M. A. (2013a). Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis.  International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(4), 1795–1805. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.025.
Ahmadi, P., Dincer, I., and Rosen, M. A. (2013b). Performance assessment and optimization of a novel integrated multigeneration system for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 67, 568–578. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.046.
Azizimehr, B., Assareh, E., and Moltames, R. (2019). Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a solar micro CCHP by using TLBO algorithm for domestic application. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1604883.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, M. (1996). Thermal Design & Optimization. John Wiley.
Bicer, Y., and, Dincer, I. (2016). Development of a new solar and geothermal based combined system for hydrogen production. Solar Energy, 127, 269–284. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.01.031.
Borgnakke, C., and Sonntag, R. E. (2019). Fundamentals of thermodynamics.
Boyaghchi, F. A., and Heidarnejad, P. (2015). Thermoeconomic assessment and multi objective optimization of a solar micro CCHP based on Organic Rankine Cycle for domestic application. Energy Conversion and Management, 97, 224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.036.
Ebrahimi, M., Keshavarz, A., and Jamali, A. (2012). Energy and exergy analyses of a micro-steam CCHP cycle for a residential building. Energy and Buildings, 45, 202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.009.
El-Emam, R. S., and Dincer, I. (2013). Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and optimization of geothermal organic Rankine cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 59(1–2), 435–444. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.06.005.
Elahifar, S., Assareh, E., and Moltames, R. (2019). Exergy analysis and thermodynamic optimisation of a steam power plant-based Rankine cycle system using intelligent optimisation algorithms. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering. doi: 10.1080/14484846.2019.1661807.
Energy and Exergy Efficiency Improvement of a Solar Driven Trigeneration System Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. (2019) Solar Energy Research. doi: 10.22059/JSER.2019.70905.
Esmaili, P., Dincer, I., and Naterer, G. F. (2012). Energy and exergy analyses of electrolytic hydrogen production with molybdenum-oxo catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(9), 7365–7372. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.076.
Garousi Farshi, L., Mahmoudi, S. M. S., and Rosen, M. A. (2013). Exergoeconomic comparison of double effect and combined ejector-double effect absorption refrigeration systems. Applied Energy, 103, 700–711. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.022.
Kanoglu, M., Ayanoglu, A., and Abusoglu, A. (2011). Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system. Energy, 36(7), 4422–4433. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.081.
Kanoglu, M., Dincer, I., and Cengel, Y. A. (2008). Investigation of geothermal energy use in gas liquefaction. Heat Transfer Engineering, 29(10), 885–892. doi: 10.1080/01457630802125781.
Kaviri, A. G., Jaafar, M. N. M., and Lazim, T. M. (2012). Modeling and multi-objective exergy based optimization of a combined cycle power plant using a genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 58, 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.01.002.
Keykhah, S., Assareh, E., Moltames, R., Izadi, M., and Ali, H. M. (2019). Heat transfer and fluid flow for tube included a porous media: Assessment and Multi-Objective Optimization Using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123804.
Midilli, A., and Dincer, I. (2007). Key strategies of hydrogen energy systems for sustainability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(5), 511–524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.050.
Mohammadkhani, F., Shokati, N., Mahmoudi, S. M. S., Yari, M., and Rosen, M. A. (2014). Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles. Energy, 65, 533–543. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.002.
Momirlan, M., and Veziroglu, T. N. (2005). The properties of hydrogen as fuel tomorrow in sustainable energy system for a cleaner planet. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30(7), 795–802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.10.011.
Ni, M., Leung, M. K. H., and Leung, D. Y. C. (2008). Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(10), 2748–2756. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.018.
Ratlamwala, T. A. H., Dincer, I., and Gadalla, M. A. (2012). Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated geothermal based quadruple effect absorption system for multigenerational purposes. Thermochimica Acta, 535, 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.02.008.
Shiva Kumar, S., and Himabindu, V. (2019). Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis – A review. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2(3), 442–454. doi: 10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002.
Yilanci, A., Dincer, I., and Ozturk, H. K. (2009). A review on solar-hydrogen/fuel cell hybrid energy systems for stationary applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.004.
Yilmaz, C. (2017). Thermoeconomic modeling and optimization of a hydrogen production system using geothermal energy’, Geothermics, 65,  32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.08.008.
Yilmaz, C., and Kanoglu, M. (2014). Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis. Energy, 69, 592–602. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.054.
Yuksel, Y. E., Ozturk, M., and Dincer, I. (2018). Thermodynamic analysis and assessment of a novel integrated geothermal energy-based system for hydrogen production and storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(9), 4233–4243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.137.