Economic Evaluation of RO and MEH Desalination Units in Iranian South-Eastern Villages

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Sirjan University of Technology, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

The primary objective of desalination research is the development of a way to produce fresh water at lower cost. The present study investigated two freshwater production methods of Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Multi-Effect Humidification (MEH) (artificial distillation), and analyzed them from an economic standpoint, and subsequently pointed out the important and effective factors in decreasing saltwater desalination expenditure for each one of the mentioned units. Different aspects of these units were investigated as well. However, all the prices are assumed with the current condition and expenses in Sistan Baluchestan province, Iran. The results from economic analyses, obtained employing COMFAR III, showed that, in regions where locals have access to local grid, application of RO unit has no economic justification, while MEH units, powered by solar energy, are more economic in remote regions receiving adequate solar irradiation. However, the water produced by RO can be purchased at 0.02 $/lit, and by solar MEH unit (Respect to introduced characterization), at 0.032 $/lit. Although, the sensitive analysis of IRRs’ variation in proportion to three factors namely sales income, fixed capital expenditure and operational expenditure were conducted. 

Keywords

References

Al-Sahali M., Ettouney, H. (2007). “Developments in thermal desalination processes: Design, energy, and costing aspects”, Desalination 214 227–240,
Benjamin, C. O. (2006). “A framework for evaluating new technologies”. International journal of technology transfer and commercialisation, 5(3), 181-194.
 Brent, R.J. (2006). “Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing.
EPA (2006). Volunteer Estuary Monitoring Manual, Methods Manual, Second Edition, EPA-842-B-06-003.
Farid, M.M., Parekh, S., Selmon, J.R. and Al-Hallaj, S. (2002). “Solar desalination with humidification-dehumidification cycle: Mathematical modeling of the unit”, Desalination, 151, 153-164,
Hafez, A., and El-Manharawy, S. (2003). Economics of seawater RO desalination in the Red Sea region, Egypt. Part 1: a case study, Desalination, 153 335–347,
Helal, A.M. Al-Malek, S.A., Al-Katheeri, E.S. (2008) “Economic feasibility of alternative designs of a PV-RO desalination unit for remote areas in the United Arab Emirates”, Desalination 221 1–16,
Mitsch, W.J. and Gosselink, J.G. (1986). Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. 539p
OECD, (2008). “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments”, OECD Publishing.
Tan, C. H., & Ng, H. Y. (2010). “A novel hybrid forward osmosis-nanofiltration (FO-NF) process for seawater desalination: draw solution selection and system configuration”. Desalination and water treatment, 13(1-3), 356-361.
Wijmans, J. G., & Baker, R. W. (1995). “The solution-diffusion model: a review”. Journal of membrane science, 107(1), 1-21.
Environmental Energy and Economic Research
Volume 1, Issue 1
February 2017
Pages 99-112

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics